Decision on discharge consent will have broad repercussions - ECAN

ECAN says a recent court decision to set aside a discharge consent for an irrigation scheme could have wide-ranging impacts on economic activity around the country.

In March this year, the High Court found that a material error of law had been made in the Commissioner’s decision (PDF file, 1015.77KB) to grant a discharge consent to Ashburton Lyndhurst Irrigation Ltd (ALIL). The decision will have wide-ranging impacts on future applications for all types of discharge consents where water quality is degraded.

Canterbury Regional Council Chief Executive Dr Stefanie Rixecker said the decision has highlighted a need for clarification on the intention behind Section 107 of the Resource Management Act (RMA).

Previous
Previous

Update on the Government’s work to amend the RMA.

Next
Next

New Zealand’s annual emissions decreased in 2022